Cromey Online

The writings of author, therapist, and priest Robert Warren Cromey.

My Photo
Name:
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

THE REV. EDWARD JOSEPH BEREY r.i.p.

THE REV. EDWARD JOSEPH BEREY

May 14, 1930 - December 24, 2010

Edward was in The General Theological Seminary, New York City, class of 1956. He was in classes with me and seemed distant, reserved, a bit wise-ass and hostile. My then wife Lillian took a liking to him and invited him to dinner with us and we became acquainted and quite good friends for the rest of the time in seminary and afterward. I found we laughed and gossiped at all the same things.

Ed had been in Military Intelligence in the U.S. Army during the Korean War and came to seminary afterward. We were ordained together on June 17, 1956 by Horace Donegan Bishop of New York who gave Ed a white stole of his own, as Ed did not own one.

Ed became a member of the church when he had been placed in an Episcopal orphanage, as his parents were not able physically and financially to care for him although they were both alive. He went on to Guilford College in North Carolina. He told me he felt bad that his family left him in the home.

After ordination Edward was sent to a small church in Tuxedo, N.Y. where he had various troubles and excommunicated his senior warden. Ed had a quick temper and judgmental style. He pulled rank when pastoral care was needed. The bishop had to intervene. Lillian and our daughters Leigh and Sarah visited Ed in Tuxedo. He was the Godfather to our second child Sarah born in 1958. He kept in touch and we with him by telephone in those days.

Ed’s second job was as an assistant in a parish on Staten Island. He was unhappy there, as he did not get along with his boss who was rector of the parish.

When Edward’s mother died in the late fifties, he asked me to do the funeral service for her. I was honored to do so.

Ed soon moved on to Seattle where he became head of camps for the diocese. He seemed to enjoy his work there. He married a woman named Sharon and they had a daughter Helen. After the divorce she married Jim Michel who has since died.

According to Ed his wife’s parents did not approve of Ed partly because of his dark middle European skin. They accused him of being of another race. When Ed and his wife had problems she went to stay with her parents with Helen and the parents moved too have the marriage dissolved and Ed was forbidden to see Helen. Ed resented it that the Bishop there never helped him in his marital problems and allowed these rich Episcopalians to manipulate things that he lost contact with his daughter. Please, dear reader, I have only Ed’s side of the story and it was many yeas ago that I heard it. Ed, like many and me, have trouble with authority and lash out against it when we feel wronged.

I had moved to San Francisco in 1962. Ed visited us and stayed with us for several weeks. During that time I put his name in to be rector of Church of St. John the Evangelist here in the city. He got the job and was supposed to work together with three other churches and me to help those weak churches grow. Ed and I had conflicts, as he was not cooperative, as I saw it, in our joint efforts. He said he did not have to follow us as he was a rector and could stand alone.

Several of the other clergy and I became very active and public in the civil rights movement. We pickted auto agencies and hotels that discriminated against minorities. Ed did not join us. He wanted to be separate from our ministry and had a secretive quality of not wanting to be public with his opinions. I am sure he was all for civil rights for all but he did not want to join our efforts. We saw each other socially and played tennis from time to time. He was much better at it than I was.

Ed stayed at St. John’s for a few years and married Patricia Penn and moved to Marin. He became involved with the federal poverty program in that county. We did not speak or have contact for a decade. He and Patricia divorced. He was very devoted to his daughters Rachael and Alisandra. He often spoke wistfully of Helen.

Edward and I met up at a clergy conference laughed at each other and became friends again. We saw each other from time to time in Marin or in SF for lunch. Later he met Jill. They married in the 1980s and I was invited to perform the ceremony, which I did in Bolinas, CA. I was married to Ann by then and she accompanied me to the wedding. Soon Jill and Edward had Adam and he was thrilled to be a proud father at 55 years old.

Again I saw Ed from time to time. I had become the rector of Trinity, SF in 1981. Ed and Jill divorced but Ed was still anxious to be a good divorced Dad and told me he did all he could to stay in contact with Adam. I always admired his devotion to his children.

Ed took Episcopal services when clergy were on vacation and wanted a weekend off. He was living in Cotati when I last saw him.

He told me that he had developed prostate cancer and was coming to the city to the Veteran’s Hospital for treatments. He also went for dental treatment at the UOP clinic on Webster St. We met rather regularly for a while over lunch when he came to the city. He had another woman friend who lived in the northwest and she came to see him in Cotati. German I think.

He wrote for a local paper, a humor column called Elderberry, which was quite wry and delightful. He has a real talent for words and observing the absurdity of life.

Our last and final falling out was in December of 2006. It was the 50th anniversary of our ordination as priests. I was planning to celebrate Eucharist and preach on December 17, 2006, a Sunday. I invited Ed to come to the service and read the gospel and assist at the service. He said he did not want to be be only a deacon. I wanted to do both as I had been rector for twenty years and retired from there for four. No one in the parish knew Edward. He felt diminished and cut off all contact with me.

On December 21, 2010 I heard from Rachel that Edward had terminal lung cancer and was dying in a skilled nursing facility in Marin County.

Ed was charming, had a good sense of humor. He used to tease that he was the only Hungarian priest in the Episcopal Church. His parent’s origins were Hungarian. He had black hair and dark eyes and an olive complexion. He was slender wiry and physically strong.

He certainly could charm and had no trouble winning women. He was the flirt of flirts. His act with waitress was annoying and delightful. He would ask endless questions about the menu, ask what she liked best and pulled delaying tactics that annoyed Adam and me once when we dined together.

Edward enjoyed being a pastor and cared for his parishioners and those committed to his charge. He was liberal on social issues

He was argumentative and relentless in discussion and had trouble letting go of a subject if he thought he was right. He got in trouble for driving under the influence of alcohol and was a moderate drinker when last I saw him.

He was very much an individual and “walked to the beat of a different drummer.” He distrusted Bishops and church structure He was bitter toward the church, as he got almost no pension. Working as a supply priest, the local churches paid him a fee but did not pay into the Church Pension Fund. So although he worked for the church, he received few benefits. I don’t blame him for his attitude toward the church.

One tactic that used to drive me nuts was “Cromey why don’t you write the Bishop….? About whatever issue he wanted to bring up. “Cromey, why don’t you write to the Chronicle about….?

He also was a blamer. Most often when he spoke to me about problems he was having, it was because the other person did something wrong. I do not remember him ever taking responsibility for anything that ever happened to him.

I never heard what happened to end his marriages in any detail but it was always because the woman did something wrong.

I always liked Ed. I know he liked and cared for me and was interested in my work. He was not easy to be with and I often felt myself on the defensive with him. I think his ministry with the poverty program and working with street kids in Marin was his most satisfying job. He was very proud of that work and spoke of it often. I also know he was immensely proud of his children and really loved and cared for them.

RWC

Some further thoughts.

Frankly, I have been rather haunted about Ed in the least few days. Perhaps I should have tried to reach him to kiss and make up. How devastating it must have been for Edward to have been in an orphanage knowing his parents were alive. He alluded to the fact about that experience but not about the emotional devastation is must have caused him. I wonder if he was ridiculed by the other children who had no parents and teased Edward that he had parents but they put him in the home. How much he must have feared rejection but often seemed to court it. Part of why he became a priest was because the orphanage was an Episcopal institution. I believe the orphanage school and/or the church helped put Edward through college. Then he felt the church had rejected him. These are the thoughts that run through my mind these past days.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

MORE ON DRONES

More Drone Bombs

Twice as many drone bombings were made this year than last. This week such a raid “incinerated three trucks” suspected of carrying fighters and weapons in Pakistan. (SF Chronicle 12/28/10) Last I noticed we are at war with Afghanistan, not Pakistan. The report did not confirm that fighters were killed only that people were killed. Civilians are often killed in these drone attacks. Neither the military nor the media can confirm who gets killed. Is it any wonder hat the United States and our military are so hated around the world with such heartless wanton killing in a country with whom we are not at war?

Here is an article I wrote a while back on this subject.

Killing by Remote – by Robert Warren Cromey

Killing people in war is bad enough. Killing civilians is very bad. Killing suspected terrorists is bad. Killing suspects without due process of law, without a hearing or a trial is very bad. Killing innocent people in suicide bombings is very bad. Killing people with rifles, handguns and knives is also bad.

But killing people by remote control is evil and cowardly. Worst yet the Obama administration has dropped more bombs in nine months than the Bush people did in three years.

A soldier today controls drone aircraft thousands of miles away. He is sitting at a desk at a computer. Using technological targeting, she presses a button that drops bombs on buildings and people. What a wonder of science. What a skillful new way of waging war. What ingenuity we humans have.

So what is wrong with such activity?

1. It has no emotion in it. It is done without feeling. The soldier works the shift, drops the bombs and then goes home to dinner with the family There may have been some thought and feeling at first but after a while those are numbed as they become routine office activities like playing computer games.

2. No one but the victims see and feel the damage. Only they suffer. The perpetrator sees or feels nothing of the suffering and death caused by his or her action.

3. Killing by remote is cruel. It inflicts punishment and death on unsuspecting human beings who may or may not be military or even enemies.

4. The drones destroy villages, primitive buildings, caves and tents. They are not directed at big cities or industrial complexes.

5. No medical help is provided to the victims of remote bombings. Since the bombings are always a surprise medical aid to the wounded will be delayed and perhaps not available at all in remote villages and caves in Afghanistan.

6. There is no way to determine the success or failure of the mission. The perpetrators are not on the scene. Ground forces may or may not be near enough to assess the results of the bombing. The victims’ accounts will no doubt be exaggerated and inaccurate.

7. Since the victims have no way to fight back directly they will find other ways to retaliate probably using so-called terrorist activities all the more. The families and friends of the victims will be very good candidates for extremist organizations. They won’t be lining up to join the U.S. and NATO forces.

8. It stimulates more hate and rage in the surviving victims. They have more reason than ever to hate our country, do all they can, by whatever means to drive our soldiers from their native soil. Thus more and more of our soldiers and their families will be wounded and killed.

9. “What is the greatest contradiction of our time? The US continues to fight ‘terror with terror,’ Current and past administrations cleverly define this strategy as ‘counterterrorism.’

One only needs to look at US Code 18 Section 2331 for further proof. An act of international terrorism, according to it, involves:

A) Violent acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation of committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State; B) Intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

Is that clear enough?”

The US Government says it is now legal to kill women and children if it means one drone attack can kill one militant or terrorist.

The worst evil of all is that the CIA, not the Air Force or the military direct the drone program. The CIA is a rogue organization that virtually is independent of the foreign policy of the US. Its skullduggery has killed innocents, corrupted duly elected governments and brought ruin and disrespect to our country’s freedom and all we stand for.

All of this makes the action of extremist Muslims who bombed the World Trade Center seem quite justified.

Every American should be ashamed of this particular way of waging war. We in the church should stand strong criticizing this cowardly and evil way to wage war.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

PRESIDENT GRANT AND CHRISTMAS

Christmas Holiday

Christmas was first proclaimed a national holiday on June 27, 1870 when President Ulysses S. Grant signed a law making Christmas, Fourth of July and Thanksgiving holidays. Up to that time workers had no day off for those special commemorative days. The Christian churches celebrated Christmas as the day when Jesus was born in a stable at Bethlehem. Political leaders in those days were at least nominal Christians and made this religious day a holiday as it was an important day in church life.

Today Christmas day is a day off from work for many people. Banks, government offices, businesses and may stores close on this day. Practicing Christmas celebrate the birth of Jesus. Many people pay little attention to Jesus except to know the words of many of the traditional carols that permeate the airwaves and background music in stores.

Soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan may acknowledge Christmas day but few will have a day off. Transit workers, police, firefighters and hospital employees will also be working.

Christians today are deeply divided over issues of child molestation, abortion, birth control, homosexuality, war, and peace. Catholic priests and protestant ministers sexually abuse parishioners. Business executives and politicians sexually abuse employees and colleagues. Not much new there.

Institutional churches suffer the same problems that most businesses do. Corruption, graft, sexual harassment, hypocrisy, inertia and grandiosity are part of what happens in all imperfect human organizations.

For those who take the birth of Jesus seriously, the essential values of his ministry are recalled. He lived a life of healing, forgiving, loving, seeking justice for the poor and confronting the powerful. That is what Christmas is for many whether Christian or not.

So thank you President Grant for a day off to think of many things.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Christmas, Islam and Jesus

The people of Islam must wonder what is going on at Christmas time. They hear the words Season’s Greetings, Happy Holidays, Happy Hanukah and Merry Christmas. They know it all points toward December 25, Christmas Day, which celebrates the birth Of Jesus. It is a government sponsored holiday where people are off from work, banks and government offices are closed, and even mail delivery ceases.

What must Muslims feel, hearing and seeing all this good cheer, felicitous greeting and a sense of good will toward all? Yet they know that their mosques are being desecrated in the United States, much like synagogues are burned and desecrated. They know some Americans voice aloud hatred and fear of all Muslims because some people professing that religion murder, destroy and persecute Americans, Europeans and other Muslims. Some politicians openly exploit hatred of Muslims for votes.

The religion of Islam respects and reveres Jesus, a Jew, as he and Muhammad both believed in one God. Jews also are monotheists believing in one God. Some Christians and Muslims believe Jesus is the Messiah. Here are some quotes from the Koran that sound disturbingly like the words of Jesus:

None of you believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself.

The merciful are shown mercy by the All-Merciful. Show mercy to those on earth, and God will show mercy to you.

God does not judge you according to your appearance and your wealth, but He looks at your hearts and looks into your deeds.

Jesus quoting from the Old Testament says, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God…and thy neighbor as thyself.”

“Jesus said unto him, ‘If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.”’

The Koran, like the Bible, has passages of punishment, revenge and approval of mayhem. But the people of Islam, like followers of the Bible, pick and choose those passages which they prefer to follow. The vast majority of the people of Islam are law-abiding, peace-loving, caring people like the Jewish, Christian, non-believing and secular citizens of the United States.

This Christmas season is again a reminder that we are people of good will to all our neighbors, and especially this year our Islamic neighbors in the United States and throughout the world.

RWC